🔗 Share this article

England have been knocked out of a World Cup after losing a match they were expected to win, thanks to a one-off innings which nobody saw coming. Sound familiar? That’s because it applies to two incidents involving England which occurred almost exactly a year separated: recently, their ODI World Cup semi-final loss at the hands of South Africa; a year ago, their defeat in a must-win group stage match against West Indies in the T20 version.

What Happened Next

In the interim, there was a 16-0 Ashes debacle and a post-series review which was meant to change everything. Was it successful? Let’s look a little more deeply into those two World Cup exits. In 2024, England fell to pieces, missed multiple opportunities, and allowed a bish-bash-bosh innings from Qiana Joseph to seal the match. In the latest match, a player with beautiful technique and temperament – the South Africa captain, Laura Wolvaardt – showed why she is one of the world’s best batters. She offered up precisely one chance – a catch to Alice Capsey at long-on – and England took it. Unfortunately, she had already scored 169 runs by that point.

‘This will hurt’: Edwards looks to next generation after England’s World Cup drubbing.

It probably won’t bring the England head coach, Charlotte Edwards, much comfort as she returns from her first World Cup in charge – she is a performance-focused leader, and a loss is a loss. But she has already made a difference. From the doldrums of multiple fielding errors in a single day of Test cricket in Melbourne, half a year on England secured more chances this World Cup than any other team. That’s an improvement.

England’s Innings Struggles

The problem was following Wolvaardt’s knock. Did anyone inside that England dressing room truly confident they were capable of chasing down a total of more than 300? Undoubtedly no one outside it did. England’s rapid decline to 0/2 and one for three provoked a reaction not of horror but of weary inevitability.

“We do need to enhance our batting performance – I don’t think it’s been consistent enough at times,” Edwards said after the match. Therein lies the concern. There have been eight totals of more than 300 in this tournament: a portion were hit by Australia, three by India, and two by South Africa. This is the new normal in women’s ODI cricket: in order to rival the world’s best, England need a batting order which can confidently expect to surpass 300 runs. But when only Nat Sciver-Brunt and Heather Knight has a track record of regularly making meaningful runs, well, the numbers speak for themselves.

Partnership Efforts

Capsey’s century stand with Sciver-Brunt in the semi-final wasn’t entirely pointless – Capsey demonstrated that she can play responsibly, at least for 70 balls – but it was insufficient to win the game. In comparison with South Africa, who were able to score 117 runs from their last 10 overs, exceeding the magic 300, because Wolvaardt had confidence in the batters following her and felt she had the liberty to hit out. “Aware of our resources in the sheds with the last 10 coming up, I thought I’d better have a swing,” she told Sky Sports.

Heather Knight and Nat Sciver-Brunt were the sole consistent performers to score runs consistently during the tournament.

Managerial Decisions

When Edwards was appointed in April, her challenge was whether to stick or twist: she chose to allow an ageing ODI side who had bombed in the Ashes one last shot at World Cup glory. This proved incorrect. England come back with the worst of both worlds: without a trophy, and with no foundations on which to rebuild over the next four years. Five of their top six from the semi-final are probably not featuring in another 50-over World Cup.

A change of approach is now approaching, as Edwards herself signalled. “This is the end of an ODI cycle,” she said. “We’ve got to focus ahead now.”

Future Prospects

It’s about time: an opportunity to evaluate at the 21-year-old left-handed batter Grace Scrivens, the young wicketkeeper Seren Smale and the 18-year-old left-arm spinner Tilly Corteen-Coleman.

The nagging worry is that it might already be too late: England’s latest round of central contracts were finalized on 1 October. The cricket board has not yet published a full list of contracted players, but it isn’t difficult to deduce that the current World Cup squad are the main beneficiaries.

Moving Forward

Stagnation and complacency were the dual enemies on which the Ashes sweep was built – it’s crucial for Edwards to signal that she is serious about preventing their return.